The new Thai leader

Having heard Mr.Abphisit's interview on the day new Thai government was formed, many people may have become sleepless. It seemed impossible for anybody to oppose him due to such smooth and amusing speeches that Mr.Abphisit delivered through broadcasting interview. In the question of how Nevin's fraction of PPP switched itself into his side, he claimed that "it basically realized that Mr.Thaksin's regime had caused extensive conflict within nation". "The Thaksin regime is no longer acceptable for them". The question I'd like to raise is that how could he justify something like that. He were pretending not to perceive real causes of political trouble. How many time we see him blaiming the yellow-shirted group who cause damages to the country in both economy and society. He is definitely political opportunist; he is born to be low-maturitied politician, lacking of accountability and available to do anything benificial for his political position, regardless of how proper the means are. He is still in favour of a principle that good-looking image have to be maintained, even in tough situation like this time, while hostility-looking perspectives should be known as Thaksin's character. This is what robust leaders and positive-attituded politicians would never behave.

Some of his shameless movements can be roughly described:
1) In the time of Thaksin's administrative, Mr.Thaksin were facing political stress caused by Sonthi-formed protesters which were actively boasted as majority's opinion of people in Thailand. Soon after Thaksin's resignation, he came up with the offer of given prime minister based on 7th section in constitution toward majesty; unfortunately, our king said that it would not be traditionally correct to treat thing like that and would distort dimocratic principle under monarchy. He had really strong demand to play a leader role in Thailand even if that would be inappropriate.
2) He significantly participated in making up Jakrapob's accusation of dishonoring majesty. With no concern of how reliable the withnesses was, he kept attacking some Jakrapob's speeches translated with bias. It may be reasonably pointless for anyone to concentrate on parts of his statements because none of them was found to be hostile speeches toward the monarchy.
3) After Thaksin’s parliament dissolution due to high political climate in 2006, he boycotted democratically-processed election. He was aware of complete disadvantage of his competing capability. This is action of oldest political party in Thailand which has kept presenting its democracy-adhering standpoint all the time but its behavior did not correspond to what it acted.
4) In the latest movement, it has eventually became clear for Thais that how desirous he has been in acting as the Prime minister. There are a lot of things he commited to do in pursue of his political goal: purchases of any Thaksin-betraying representative, ignorance of parliament dissolution, and contribution of attentively-allotted seats in cabinet to those whom his party has been very grateful toward like relative individuals in companies that play a role in feeding the party, PAD, or troops.
All of his dark scenes mentioned above still remain uninformed. There would be some more interesting points about such hole coming up in the coming mistrustful meeting.